crime scene photos nicole brown simpson ronald goldman

The defense doesn’t want the jury to see them. In most murder trials, the prosecution and defense fight over the admissibility of autopsy photographs. The only person that’s got to worry about a DNA test being done in a criminal case is the person who committed the crime. The people that like DNA are the police, the victims, the prosecutors who are looking for the truth. It made everybody eager to move on to the next phase of the trial, which consisted of the autopsy pictures of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, the victims of this appalling crime, whose names are so rarely mentioned. It’s like advanced math, brilliant but boring, astonishing but passionless. During Cravin’s 15 minutes of fame, spent racing from one television show to another in a chauffeur-driven limousine, he referred to the defendant as “the Juice.” The fact is, although DNA testing may be as foolproof as fingerprinting, it doesn’t cause excitement. The 170-million-to-1 odds that blood found at the crime scene was O. For at least one of them, Willie Cravin-subsequently dismissed for allegedly intimidating another juror-the DNA evidence apparently proved absolutely nothing. During the DNA material, the jurors’ eyes began to glaze over. Anyone can tell you that a point isn’t worth making unless it gets across to the jury. They didn’t understand that asking the same question over and over again ultimately bores people and causes tune-out. Defense lawyers Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld were brilliant, and wonderfully prepared, but they seemed totally unaware that less is more. Like everything else in this trial, it went on too long, especially the cross-examinations. The presentation of the DNA evidence has ended, at least for now, and not a moment too soon.

Crime scene photos nicole brown simpson ronald goldman